Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DualEdge Invest's avatar

Great article! In my opinion, reverse DCF is a method that's used not often enough by investors. Most of them prefer using "regular" DCF, without really understanding the consequences and assumptions that underly this model.

If I could give you one tip, Excel provides a "Solver" (link to setup guide: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/define-and-solve-a-problem-by-using-solver-5d1a388f-079d-43ac-a7eb-f63e45925040).

This Solver allows you to calculate the implied growth rate immediately, rather than adjusting it manually to equal the current stock price, so it might save you some time!

Expand full comment
Miguel Teixeira's avatar

Great article. In my opinion adding back growth capex is something that i Will do but with a grain of salt and just to give me a pulse of it, because using depreciation as a proxy for Maintenance capex is in some manner a estimation with a large probability of error, i think the pool of companies that overestimate the depreciation schedule is huge, because they dont count with the rapid advance in Technology, and the rise of inflation. In than is the question of the capitalized portion of intangibles, like R&D and SG&A. I prefer to leave the capitalized investments of the equation and have a more conservative aproach

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts